Today’s stock market looks like March 2009, before the longest bull run in history,
says Morgan Stanley’s Mike Wilson
By Chris Matthews
Stocks’ value relative to bonds is equal that of 2009
As investors navigate the coronavirus recession, the financial crisis a decade ago looms
large in their collective memory, with pessimists arguing that the resulting bear market
took 18 months to hit its lowest point and optimists countering that swift and decisive action
from the Federal Reserve and Congress this time around has saved the stock market from
that fate.
large in their collective memory, with pessimists arguing that the resulting bear market
took 18 months to hit its lowest point and optimists countering that swift and decisive action
from the Federal Reserve and Congress this time around has saved the stock market from
that fate.
Michael Wilson, head of U.S. equity strategy at Morgan Stanley is squarely in the bull camp,
arguing in a Monday note to clients that the current stock market looks uncannily like
March 2009, when the U.S. economy was emerging from the crisis, and the
S&P 500 index SPX,+3.15% was beginning its longest bull-market run in history.
arguing in a Monday note to clients that the current stock market looks uncannily like
March 2009, when the U.S. economy was emerging from the crisis, and the
S&P 500 index SPX,
“Markets are tracking the Great Financial Crisis period very closely in many ways,” Wilson
wrote, adding that stocks have rebounded in a “similar pattern” to March 2009, at the same
time that the number of individual stocks trading above their 200-day moving average has
begun to climb, supported by “cyclical stocks” like small-capitalization stocks, which typically
lead at the beginning of recoveries.
wrote, adding that stocks have rebounded in a “similar pattern” to March 2009, at the same
time that the number of individual stocks trading above their 200-day moving average has
begun to climb, supported by “cyclical stocks” like small-capitalization stocks, which typically
lead at the beginning of recoveries.
the expected earnings yield for the S&P 500 minus the 10-year Treasury yield, which
gives investors a rough estimate of the extra return they’ll get investing in stocks compared
with risk-free government bonds.
“A significant driver of our bullish call in March was based on the equity-risk premium
reaching the same levels observed in March 2009,” Wilson wrote, referring to his calling a
stock-market bottom on March 16, just a week before the S&P 500 closed at its recent
low of 2,237 on March 23.
“If there’s one thing we’ve learned over the past 10 years, it’s that when risk premium
appears you need to grab it before it disappears,” he said. The risk premium will fall either
when bond prices fall and interest rates rise or when equity prices rise, thereby reducing
their expected return.
Though traditional cyclical stocks like small-caps have outperformed of late — the Russell 2000 RUT,
— others, like financial stocks have not. In fact, bank stocks are performing worse relative to
the S&P 500 than during the bank-driven financial crisis.
Wilson explained this dynamic by arguing that the very same Fed stimulus that has
truncated the coronavirus bear market is repressing government bond yields in a way that is
scaring bank investors. “The biggest headwind for banks is the persistently low level of rates,”
particularly for longer-term debt, Wilson wrote. Low interest rates hurt banks because they
lower the profit margins they can earn by issuing loans.
But Wilson believes the market is underestimating the chances that longer-term bond yields,
significantly as the economy rebounds from coronavirus, and is therefore underestimating
chances for a huge rally in financial-sector stocks.
He pointed to Congress passing at least $3 trillion in fiscal stimulus, the potential for a faster
and more sustained recovery in the post-coronavirus economy and unexpected inflation as
demand returns before supply chains can adjust as possible catalysts for higher inflation and
long-term interest rates.
“While hypothetical, these are real possibilities and worth considering given current levels of
inflation and 10-year Treasury yields,” Wilson wrote. “We continue to think higher 10-year
rates would be perhaps the biggest surprise to markets at the moment and would have
significant implications for equity markets and leadership.”
Wilson explained this dynamic by arguing that the very same Fed stimulus that
has truncated the coronavirus bear market is repressing government bond yields in a
way that is scaring bank investors.
has truncated the coronavirus bear market is repressing government bond yields in a
way that is scaring bank investors.
“The biggest headwind for banks is the persistently low level of rates,” particularly
for longer-term debt, Wilson wrote. Low interest rates hurt banks because they lower the
profit margins they can earn by issuing loans.
for longer-term debt, Wilson wrote. Low interest rates hurt banks because they lower the
profit margins they can earn by issuing loans.
But Wilson believes the market is underestimating the chances that longer-term bond
yields, like the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note TMUBMUSD10Y,0.705% , will
rise significantly as the economy rebounds from coronavirus, and is therefore
underestimating chances for a huge rally in financial-sector stocks.
yields, like the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note TMUBMUSD10Y,
rise significantly as the economy rebounds from coronavirus, and is therefore
underestimating chances for a huge rally in financial-sector stocks.
He pointed to Congress passing at least $3 trillion in fiscal stimulus, the potential for a
faster and more sustained recovery in the post-coronavirus economy and unexpected
inflation as demand returns before supply chains can adjust as possible catalysts for
higher inflation and long-term interest rates.
faster and more sustained recovery in the post-coronavirus economy and unexpected
inflation as demand returns before supply chains can adjust as possible catalysts for
higher inflation and long-term interest rates.
“While hypothetical, these are real possibilities and worth considering given current levels
of inflation and 10-year Treasury yields,” Wilson wrote. “We continue to think higher
10-year rates would be perhaps the biggest surprise to markets at the moment and would
have significant implications for equity markets and leadership.”
of inflation and 10-year Treasury yields,” Wilson wrote. “We continue to think higher
10-year rates would be perhaps the biggest surprise to markets at the moment and would
have significant implications for equity markets and leadership.”
No comments:
Post a Comment